rsqnonny (rsqnonny) wrote in rsqubf,
rsqnonny
rsqnonny
rsqubf

  • Mood:

Somebody gets it

Interesting update in the Apologetics Index entry on UBF:


Oct. 8, 2008 Update -- Please note:

This entry on University Bible Fellowship (UBF) -- as shown below the blue line -- is in need of updating. Doing so is on our lengthy to-do list, and we do not know when we get around to it.

That said, the primary update of note is that on March 18, 2008, the Board of Directors of the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) voted to re-admit the UBF as a member.

Since early May, 2008, we have received emails from a number of UBF members pointing out this fact. Some also point to a handful of endorsements the UBF has received, as well as to its membership in the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability (ECFA). Most of the emails make clear that membership in the NAE -- and, to a lesser extend, in the ECFA -- is seen as a stamp of approval for the UBF.

We do take such memberships into consideration, but they do not weigh heavily in our evaluations of groups. Many organizations are ill-equipped to deal with issues surrounding high-demand organizations and cult-like groups. They tend to base their determinations almost entirely on whether or not a movement's Statement of Faith passes their standard of orthodoxy.

Unfortunately, often a group's Statement of Faith does not quite describe what it actually teaches in word and/or in practice. In other words, a church, movement or organization can have a Statement of Faith that is theologically sound -- and yet teach doctrines ranging from aberrant to heretical and/or engage in practices that are sociologically abusive.

Therefore when it comes to University Bible Fellowship, our concerns regarding the organization have not been deminished as a result of the movement's reacceptance by the NAE.

In fact, we consider the group's authoritarian, high-demand nature to be evidence of a faulty understanding of the Gospel of Jesus Christ -- and of the Bible's teachings regarding disciples of Jesus.

We do not accept the notion that much of UBF's cult-like ideas regarding authority, submission, obedience and discipline can simply be explained by the group's Korean influences. It is not Korean culture that should influence a Christian's walk with Jesus. Rather, it should be the other way around.

In short, we have seen nothing that suggests University Bible Fellowship's teachings and practices should not -- at the very least -- be cause of concern for Christians. In our opinion, the UBF is an unhealthy organization whose teachings and practices provide a breeding ground for spiritual elitism and abuse.

Theologically, we consider the University Bible Fellowship to be at best an aberrant movement. In Christian theology, aberrant means, "Off-center or in error in some important way, such that the doctrine or practice should be rejected and those who accept it held to be sinning, even though they may very well be Christian."

Our advice to Christians is not to get involved with the University Bible Fellowship.


Indeed.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comment