?

Log in

No account? Create an account
RSQUBF LiveJournal Community
UBF 2nd gen’s theology 
31st-Dec-2005 10:46 am
UBF 2nd gen’s theology

...In terms of UBF being a cult, you need to answer the question of why God lets people meet Jesus through this ministry like I did, which would be impossible because I don't think I or the other numerous amount of people would've met Jesus if the church taught false doctrines. And I am growing spiritually in this ministry just like many other people are, and if this church is a cult and is an agent of Satan I don't think it'd be possible for me to have a relationship with Jesus.
THere's two conclusions we can make. 1. God must be extremely deceitful because he lets people really accept Jesus as their Savior through UBF, a cult or 2. UBF is a ministry that is really being used by God to bring people to Him. I'm pretty sure we can cross out conclusion #1 because God is a Holy God and it's just not in his character to let people repent and accept Jesus through false doctrine that condones lying, abortions, divorces etc. So therefore, #2 is correct... (Posted 9/2/2005 at 2:23 AM by Choi728)
Comments 
7th-Jan-2006 12:36 am (UTC) - Logical Fallacies
Gotta love logical fallacies. Let's see what we have here...
why God lets people meet Jesus through this ministry like I did, which would be impossible because I don't think I or the other numerous amount of people would've met Jesus if the church taught false doctrines.
Hmmm... Non Causa Pro Causa or the cause of an event is assumed but not validated. Who's to say that God didn't work through UBF regardless of doctrine?
Combine that with Argumentum ad populum or "Appeal to the People" : I or the other numerous amount of people would've met Jesus if the church taught false doctrines. ; sprinkle in a little Affirmation of the Consequent : THere's two conclusions we can make. 1. God must be extremely deceitful because he lets people really accept Jesus as their Savior through UBF, a cult or 2. UBF is a ministry that is really being used by God to bring people to Him. I'm pretty sure we can cross out conclusion #1 because God is a Holy God and it's just not in his character to let people repent and accept Jesus through false doctrine that condones lying, abortions, divorces etc. So therefore, #2 is correct... or that these are the only two conclusions possible, and the first one has to be correct because 2nd Gen doesn't believe the second one to be possible. There is also the issue of free will but we'll save that one for another day..
and you have a logical sounding argument that just sounds logical, but isn't.
This page was loaded Aug 20th 2019, 9:39 am GMT.