?

Log in

No account? Create an account
RSQUBF LiveJournal Community
Mark Yang 
12th-Jul-2006 08:24 am
One of the 15 questions from the Korean UBF reform committee is about Mark Yang. Who is this Mark Yang? Is he the one who used to be the director of Anam UBF (this UBF chapter was considered most exemplary when I was in Korea) and is now in Urbana Illinois working with Samuel Lee's son?

10. Last April S. Mark Yang was found to have an shameful affair with one intern shepherdess for four and half years. Later on, that intern shepherdess married a staff shepherd. They are now living a married life. However, after eating her heart out, recently she confessed to her husband all those things that S. Mark Yang did to her. Because of this, her husband submitted his resignation, concluding that he could no longer live a life of staff shepherd. Anna Yang, the wife of S. Mark Yang, came to a silent agreement with that shepherd through giving them money, in order to solve this problem quietly. But, two days later, S. Mark Yang totally denied everything after he returned to Korea. Because of this, that shepherd threatened them that he would inform all these to the Christian Ethics Practice Committee or the Sexual Harassment Protection Civil Organization. S. John Jun gave him 30,000,000 Won (about $27,000) under the condition that he would not make them issues any more. Some shepherds requested S. John Jun to get at the truth of this affair and solve this fairly through the Reward and Punishment Committee. But it was not accepted. M. Samuel Lee! How much do you know about this and how do you want to solve this?
Comments 
14th-Jul-2006 05:33 am (UTC)
(ii) Bible scholar. Mark Yang is a self-made Bible scholar.

I was checking the official website of Anamgol UBF in Korea. There was a Sunday message based on John 8:21-59 with key verse of John 8:31,32. John 8:31-32 is my favorite key verse in the Bible. But the Anamgol Bible scholar doesn't seem to know "the truth" in the passage. The Anamgol Bible scholar doesn't even seem to know "inductive bible study". He was supposed to (1) observe, (2) interpret and (3) apply according to "UBF inductive bible study". But there is no observation, no interpretation and no application. His message is like "a Sogan written by those who write a Sogam for the first time". He tends to list his personal thoughts about the bible passage without deeply meditating on it. He even mentions Immanuel Kant and his book "Critique of Pure Reason" without understanding what he is talking about! The Anamgol message is so pathetically poor. I will translate part of the pathetically poor message and post it soon.
This page was loaded Jun 20th 2019, 1:09 pm GMT.