The following from today's Chicago message seems to be a little bit strange.
"In this case, the Scripture they needed to know was Exodus 3:6. This was from the part of the Bible they claimed to believe. But in fact they were ignorant of its significance and spiritual meaning. This was not an obscure part of the Bible, like the part they had quoted from. It was a great revelation of God to his servant Moses when he met him in the burning bush. It was God’s personal introduction of himself to Moses. It was something they should have been eager to study, understand and accept. Look at verses 31-32. “But about the resurrection of the dead–have you not read what God said to you, ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob’? He is not the God of the dead but of the living.” In this verse, Jesus clearly says that God is the God of the living. This means that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were living. It means that those who believe in God are living in God. God is not the God of the dead but of the living. To know this is to solve the root problem of mankind. It is the good news of great joy to all human beings who are suffering under the power of death."
The Chicago messenger says This means that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were living. I am not an English major and English is not my native language either. But considering the context of the passage, shouldn't were in fact be are so that it should be This means that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are living? Since God is the God of the living, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are still living, aren't they? If Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were living, how can God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob be the God of the living? If there is any English major out there, please correct me if I am wrong. Is the Chicago messenger saying that God is the God of the living or the God of the dead?